A SANCTUARY IN TIME
We readily limit the significance of the cross to an emblem to consolidate a religious or cultural identity or as an excuse to enhance our misery, forgetful that “misery acquaints a man with strange bed-fellows” (William Shakespeare, The Tempest II.2).
The significance of the cross highlights our baptism because, as pointed out by Saint Augustine, all those who belong to Jesus Christ are fastened with him to the cross, which sets the setting for Bonhoeffer’s assertion that the cross is not the terrible end to an otherwise happy life: it meets us at the beginning of our communion with Christ.
Scrutinising these insights, we need to focus on Shabbat’s stillness where the cross becomes a sanctuary in time, challenging our trustworthiness: it expresses a lived-out silentium underlined by the Magister’s reassuring presence: ‘Come to me, all who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest’ (Matthew 11,26).
Our weariness expresses our effort to be loyal to Christ Jesus. Living our baptism hurts because enkindled by the warmth of Christ’s presence, we mirror his self-emptying’ (Kenosis) by being loyal to our baptismal promises.
This is the reason we seek our restfulness in the Father through His Son, which offers us an equilibrium underlined by serenity strengthened by the Holy Spirit: an insight that encourages us not to be afraid to plunge into the darkness of troubled hearts who lack the Magister’s restfulness, witnessing His compassion.
Witnessing God’s ‘loving-kindness’ (Hesed) initiates an adventure best defined by St. Ignatius as ‘Contemplatio ad Amorem’. However, adventures can prove misleading when mistaken for escapades. Hence, the need to identify with the Magister strengthens, because “For me, to live is Christ and to die is gain” (Philippians 1,21).
The Shabbat’s stillness, envisaged as a “Sanctuary in time” (Abraham Herschel, The Shabbat) initiates this identification: it requires us to explore a deeper understanding of the cross as a maturing and enriching experience focused on serving others.
Pureness of heart allows us to encounter God in others (Matthew 5,8); lacking it, abuse is ensured. Focusing solely on ourselves is easily mistaken for God’s will and the temptation to use others to satisfy personal needs or interests. Neither can we limit it to things sexual, which sometimes is interpreted as an excuse to detach from others in an attempt not to get hurt.
We are tempted to speak rather than to listen; to teach rather than learn; to do rather than to be, but this does not suffice when speaking of a discipleship underlined by prayer focused on the cross.
Contemplating the Crucifix, we learn not to rush: to embrace Shabbat’s stillness, now encountered on Golgotha, as a path to better insights and more profound exploits, which identify with the empty tomb.
Revitalised by this stillness, contemplating His body upon the cross, we are invited to live for righteousness because our wounds have been healed (1Peter 2,24): to be “still and know that I am God” (Psalm 46,10). This stillness initiates prayer because we learn to listen to our hearts: a response to God’s search for me, which, as indicated by Bonhoeffer, requires us to be interrupted in our doings by exposing our hearts to His Word.
This exposure reminds us, following Saint Theodore the Studite, that in the cross there is no mingling of good and evil, as in the tree of paradise: it is wholly beautiful to behold and good to taste. The fruit of this tree is not death but life, not darkness but light, but we understand this not by words, but by living this insight.
Martin
Comments
Post a Comment